Re: LINUX is obsolete Linux Inside
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: LINUX is obsolete

 In <12595@star.cs.vu.nl> ast@cs.vu.nl (Andy Tanenbaum) writes:
 
 >But in all honesty, I would
 >suggest that people who want a **MODERN** "free" OS look around for a 
 >microkernel-based, portable OS, like maybe GNU or something like that.
 
 There are really no other alternatives other than Linux for people like
 me who want a "free" OS.  Considering that the majority of people who
 would use a "free" OS use the 386, portability is really not all that
 big of a concern.  If I had a Sparc I would use Solaris.  
 
 As it stands, I installed Linux with gcc, emacs 18.57, kermit and all of the 
 GNU utilities without any trouble at all.  No need to apply patches. I
 just followed the installation instructions.  I can't get an OS like
 this *anywhere* for the price to do my Computer Science homework. And
 it seems like network support and then X-Windows will be ported to Linux
 well before Minix.  This is something that would be really useful. In my
 opinion, portability of standard Unix software is important also.
 
 I know that the design using a monolithic system is not as good as the
 microkernel.  But for the short term future (And I know I won't/can't
 be uprading from my 386), Linux suits me perfectly.
 
 Philip Wu
 pwu@unixg.ubc.ca
 
 
 
 Newsgroups: comp.os.minix