Re: LINUX is obsolete Linux Inside
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: LINUX is obsolete

 In article <1992Feb01.002630.14861@bmerh2.bnr.ca> dgraham@bmers30.bnr.ca (Douglas Graham) writes:
 > Minix resembles the other systems that use it.  Sure, Minix uses lots
 > of tasks and messages, but there must be more to a microkernel architecture
 > than that.  I suspect that the Minix code is not split optimally into tasks.
 
 Definitely. Minix shows you how a microkernel works, but it sure doesn't show
 you why you would use one.
 
 A couple of years ago I brought this up with Andy, and his response indicated
 that he was himself not convinced of the superiority of the microkernel design
 at the time. He said (as near as I can recall... this is a paraphrase) that a
 message passing design was inherently slower than a monolithic one... which was
 news to me: I had (and still have) a PC that was MUCH more responsive than any
 UNIX box I ever touched using a message-passing design.
 
 > >   MINIX is a microkernel-based system.
 
 > Is there a consensus on this?
 
 Yes, it's not a well-factored one, and there's no API to the microkernel
 interface, but it's a microkernel design.
 -- 
 -- Peter da Silva,  Ferranti International Controls Corporation
 -- Sugar Land, TX  77487-5012;  +1 713 274 5180
 -- "Have you hugged your wolf today?"