Re: Unhappy campers Linux Inside
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: Unhappy campers

 >>>>> On 4 Feb 92 20:57:40 GMT, fnf@fishpond.uucp (Fred Fish) said:
 
 fnf> If PH was not granted a monopoly on distribution, it would have been
 fnf> possible for all of the interested minix hackers to organize and set
 fnf> up a group that was dedicated to producing enhanced-minix.  This aim
 fnf> of this group could have been to produce a single, supported version
 fnf> of minix with all of the commonly requested enhancements.  This would
 fnf> have allowed minix to evolve in much the same way that gcc has evolved
 fnf> over the last few years.  Sure there are variant versions of gcc, but
 fnf> most of the really good enhancements, bug fixes, etc are eventually
 fnf> folded back into a master source base that future distributions derive
 fnf> from.  Thus you would have been left in peace to continue your tight
 fnf> control over the educational version of minix, and everyone else that
 fnf> wanted more than an educational tool could put their energies into
 fnf> enhanced-minx.
 
 I don't get it.  What's preventing people from doing this?  The quoted
 paragraph doesn't give any reasons for its assertions.
 
 -- Vladimir
 --
 Vladimir G. Ivanovic                            Sun Microsystems, Inc
 (415) 336-2315                                  MTV12-33
 vladimir@Eng.Sun.COM                            2550 Garcia Ave.
 {decwrl,hplabs,ucbvax}!sun!Eng!vladimir         Mountain View, CA 94043-1100
                          Disclaimer: I speak for myself.